Man United could be blocked from playing in the Champions League next season

It follows reports that a Qatari group are interested in taking over Man United

Manchester United could be blocked from playing in the Champions League next season because of UEFA rules around club ownership. In November, the Glazer family announced they were ready to listen to offers from parties interested in purchasing a stake in the Red Devils. Since then, it has been widely reported that the family are more interested in offers for a full takeover, with United's financial advisor, The Raine Group, hoping to complete a full sale of the club in the first quarter of 2023 at a price in the region of £6-7bn. One party said to be interested in buying the club are a Qatari-based investment group. The Daily Mail reports that this consists of a group of "private, high-wealth individuals based in the oil-rich state, buoyed by Qatar’s hosting of the World Cup," with an offer apparently set to be tabled ahead of the mid-February deadline set by the Glazers. However, this could have consequences for United's Champions League hopes next season, due to the fact that Qatar Sports Investments already own another major European club in the form of Paris Saint-Germain. [caption id="attachment_377300" align="alignnone" width="2048"] Man United could face complications regarding their involvement in the Champions League if they are taken over by Qatari investors (Getty)[/caption] Whilst there are no restrictions on an owner or group owning multiple clubs at the same time in different countries, UEFA rules state that clubs with the same owner are not allowed to participate in the same competition. In 1998, UEFA implemented an 'Independence of clubs' rule which states that no two clubs participating in a UEFA competition may be directly or indirectly controlled by the same ownership group. These rules were put in to place to protect the integrity of the competition and fight against corruption such as match-fixing. The rule states: "No individual or legal entity may have control or influence over more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition." This is defined as:

1. Holding a majority of the shareholders’ voting rights;
2. Having the right to appoint or remove a majority of the members of the administrative, management or supervisory body of the club;
3. Being a shareholder and alone controlling a majority of the shareholders’ voting rights pursuant to an agreement entered into with other shareholders of the club; or
4. Being able to exercise by any means a decisive influence in the decision-making of the club.

[caption id="attachment_377298" align="alignnone" width="1094"] (UEFA)[/caption] Although the group interested in United are reportedly seperate to that which owns PSG, it may well be that UEFA decides this is still in breach of the above rules. Therefore, if a Qatari group owned United while they and PSG qualify for the Champions League, there is the very real possibility that only one of the clubs would be allowed to compete in the competition. Perhaps the best example from the past to look to might be the situation between RB Leipzig and Red Bell Salzburg. Both clubs are funded by Red Bull and when they both qualified for the Champions League in 2017, UEFA had a decision to make. After a month-long investigation, and some behind-the-scenes changes at both clubs, UEFA concluded that both clubs had sufficiently untangled themselves from each other and that they would be allowed to compete in the competition together. Related links:

• Man City hire lawyer who advised Boris Johnson during lockdown ‘Partygate’
• Premier League clubs reportedly want the strongest punishment possible for Man City if found guilty
• Casemiro explains why his name has been spelt wrong his whole career
• Erik ten Hag refuses to comment on Man City charges